In the reading for Tuesday, Laura Mulvey addresses the
objectification of women in more depth that we usually see in her essay,
“Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema.” The paper discusses the key components
that go into making films. The main components are maintaining a patriarchal
standpoint and narrative (which reflects society), using women as objects to
bear meaning and then return to the actual plot, and using women as visually
appealing characters with little significance other than looking good to the
audience and the men in the scene. I found this reading important on many
levels, since even in this modern time, women are still being objectified on
different levels and to certain degrees in nearly all cinema and television in
some way or another. When I was reading the assignment, I thought of a
ridiculous amount of examples of women in film and television fitting these
molds. However, I think there are a lot of cases in popular culture that can
also apply to these concepts. I tried to think of more obscure examples that
would really show how universal this theory is. A weird one to me is the
advertisement for M&M’s and the green one is a “sexy” women M&M with
white heels and long eyelashes. But using Mulvey’s arguments about women in
media, we may be able to stretch it to explain why in the world a piece of
candy is supposed to look sexy. For one, the green M&M is made to look
appealing to the audience and the other M&Ms on the commercial or in the
advertisement in the magazine. The other candies are fawning over this one and
she serves no additional purpose than to be appealing. If she wasn’t in the
commercial, people would still eat the candy and life would go on.
No comments:
Post a Comment